0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Strauss¿Í Corbin ±Ù°ÅÀÌ·ÐÀÇ º¯È­

Changes in Strauss & Corbin¡¯s Grounded Theory

Journal of Korean Academy of Nursing 2019³â 49±Ç 5È£ p.505 ~ 514
KMID : 0806120190490050505
±èÁöÀº ( Kim Ji-Eun ) - ÃÊ´ç´ëÇб³ °£È£Çаú

Abstract

Purpose: This study aimed to introduce and elucidate changes in Strauss and Corbin¡¯s grounded theory and discuss its application to the field of nursing in South Korea.

Methods: The changes in grounded theory by Strauss and Corbin were examined through a literature review of grounded theory from its inception.

Results: Strauss and Corbin acknowledged their philosophical backgrounds of symbolic interactionism and pragmatism; however, their methodology based on positivism overwhelmed their epistemology and ontology. This inconsistency has been represented by the coding paradigm and the premise of ¡°emergent from the data.¡± In the revised version of Basics, Strauss and Corbin modified their theory to weaken the coding paradigm and strengthen the strategies for the development of substantive theory.

Conclusion: Strauss and Corbin¡¯s revised grounded theory did not fully address the inconsistency of their epistemology and ontology between their acknowledgement and methodology. However, these changes constitute a meaningful step toward resolving inconsistencies and highlight the development of substantive theory. This has implications for Korean nursing researchers who have utilized methodologies in grounded theory with dogmatic approaches; grounded theory, with its evolving nature, is not a finalized method and calls for open approaches for the development of a grounded theory that fits Korean nursing.
KeyWords
±Ù°ÅÀÌ·Ð, »ó¡Àû »óÈ£ÀÛ¿ëÁÖÀÇ, Á¾¼³
Grounded Theory, Symbolic Interactionism, Review
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
SCI(E) MEDLINE ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed